Search Icon Search site

Search

Closing Arguments Describe Different Views of 2022 Armed Carjacking Case 

The trial of Eshwan Jones, 25, concluded on April 2 with jurors hearing witness testimony and closing arguments before Baltimore City Circuit Court Judge Hope Tipton.

Jones is charged with attempted murder and armed carjacking, first-degree assault, armed robbery, conspiracy and five firearm-related offenses in connection to a shooting that occurred Feb. 10, 2022, outside a convenience store on the 100 block of N. Smallwood Street.

According to the prosecution, Jones’s co-defendant, 22-year-old Markia Vaughn, had asked the victim for a ride with the intention of carjacking him. The victim drove Vaughn to the convenience store and waited outside while she entered. 

Charging documents state that surveillance footage from outside the store captured Vaughn and a group of unidentified Black men sitting on nearby steps. Vaughn walked toward the car, turned back to the group, then approached again. Two men from the group ran and reappeared moments later from a nearby alley. Jones went to the driver’s side window and allegedlufired several shots, striking the victim. He attempted to flee but crashed his Infinity into a vacant house. The three suspects fled through an alley. 

During closing arguments, the state maintained the victim had simply been helping a friend, only to be set up for the carjacking. 

To support their claims, the state’s attorney pointed to surveillance footage showing a suspect in a red Nike hoodie committing the shooting. Earlier in trial, Jones had admitted to wearing a red hoodie that day. However, a matching garment recovered during a search of his home showed an Under Armour logo. Jones also alleged he lent the garment to someone else later that day.

The state also emphasized that Vaughn, who is currently serving a 40‑year sentence after violating a plea deal she accepted for her role in the crime, had nothing to gain from testifying against Jones. Her statements, said the state’s attorney, were consistent with evidence in the case, including text messages and investigators’ timeline of events.

Defense attorney Augustine Okeke argued the state built their case on assumptions rather than evidence and reminded jurors that investigators failed to arrest Jones until last May, over three years after the date of the shooting.

He also questioned why it took police so long to charge Jones if the evidence against him was as strong as the state claimed. He pointed to gaps in the investigation, emphasizing that text messages recovered from Vaughn’s phone never mentioned Jones or the victim, and pointed jurors’ focus to the discrepancy regarding the red hoodie’s branding.

Jurors are set to begin deliberations on April 3.

VNS Alert Icon

Stay up-to-date with incidents updates and stories, as and when they happen.

Donate Star Icon

Donate

Unlike so many organizations involved in criminal justice we have one goal – bring transparency and accountability to the DC criminal justice system.

Help us continue

Give now